Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
+4
detective392
ForeverBlu
UltimateMarvel
WyldeMan
8 posters
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
Marvel Studios presents “Avengers: Age of Ultron,” the epic follow-up to the biggest Super Hero movie of all time. When Tony Stark tries to jumpstart a dormant peacekeeping program, things go awry and Earth’s Mightiest Heroes, including Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, The Incredible Hulk, Black Widow and Hawkeye, are put to the ultimate test as the fate of the planet hangs in the balance. As the villainous Ultron emerges, it is up to The Avengers to stop him from enacting his terrible plans, and soon uneasy alliances and unexpected action pave the way for an epic and unique global adventure.
Marvel’s “Avengers: Age of Ultron” stars Robert Downey Jr., who returns as Iron Man, along with Chris Evans as Captain America, Chris Hemsworth as Thor and Mark Ruffalo as The Hulk. Together with Scarlett Johansson as Black Widow and Jeremy Renner as Hawkeye, and with the additional support of Samuel L. Jackson as Nick Fury and Cobie Smulders as Agent Maria Hill, the team must reassemble to defeat James Spader as Ultron, a terrifying technological villain hell-bent on human extinction. Along the way, they confront two mysterious and powerful newcomers, Wanda Maximoff, played by Elizabeth Olsen, and Pietro Maximoff, played by Aaron Taylor-Johnson, and meet an old friend in a new form when Paul Bettany becomes Vision.
Last edited by WyldeMan on 5/17/2015, 1:09 pm; edited 8 times in total
UltimateMarvel- Posts : 10285
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : East Coast
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
One shot of Hawkeye, they continue to direspect that character.
ForeverBlu- Posts : 3834
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 60
Location : NYC
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
ForeverBlu wrote:One shot of Hawkeye, they continue to direspect that character.
Or maybe they're not trying to reveal too much.
UltimateMarvel- Posts : 10285
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : East Coast
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
I'm sure they just don't care about the character. Black Widow is still the most useless Avenger but because the guys like her they keep giving her big parts. This is Marvel we are talking about.UltimateMarvel wrote:ForeverBlu wrote:One shot of Hawkeye, they continue to direspect that character.
Or maybe they're not trying to reveal too much.
detective392- Posts : 389
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 33
Location : Minnesota
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
detective392 wrote:I'm sure they just don't care about the character. Black Widow is still the most useless Avenger but because the guys like her they keep giving her big parts. This is Marvel we are talking about.UltimateMarvel wrote:ForeverBlu wrote:One shot of Hawkeye, they continue to direspect that character.
Or maybe they're not trying to reveal too much.
Seems like Whedon and Marvel gives no fucks about Hawkeye.
Renner's face wasn't even shown in the shot.
ForeverBlu- Posts : 3834
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 60
Location : NYC
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
detective392 wrote:I'm sure they just don't care about the character. Black Widow is still the most useless Avenger but because the guys like her they keep giving her big parts. This is Marvel we are talking about.
Riiiiiiight, the only agent with clearance as high as Fury and she's the most useless Avenger? Except for Clint, she's the only one who uses her natural abilities. Thor is a demi-god, Banner is a side show, Captain was a science project and Stark was born a billionaire, the guy doesn't even have detective skills.....
Still not sure what your criteria of useless is, but I'd definitely put Natasha Romanov with all her natural talents and skills at the top of the list of Avengers.
But hey I'm a DC fan so I like women.
_________________
Wylde's Favorite Films of 2024:
Dune Part II
Wylde's Favorite Series of 2024:
Fallout (Prime), The Gentleman (Netflix), Shogun (Hulu/Disney+)
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
_________________
Wylde's Favorite Films of 2024:
Dune Part II
Wylde's Favorite Series of 2024:
Fallout (Prime), The Gentleman (Netflix), Shogun (Hulu/Disney+)
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
Interesting! There is also a shot in the trailer of a woman in the cave getting undressed, people are saying she's Wankandan.
UltimateMarvel- Posts : 10285
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : East Coast
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
UltimateMarvel wrote:Interesting! There is also a shot in the trailer of a woman in the cave getting undressed, people are saying she's Wankandan.
Yeah there are apparently a few shots of females in African garb, it'd make sense since BP roles with an all female security team. I always wondered if that was all they did...I mean are they strictly an elite security force or are they all his women too?
_________________
Wylde's Favorite Films of 2024:
Dune Part II
Wylde's Favorite Series of 2024:
Fallout (Prime), The Gentleman (Netflix), Shogun (Hulu/Disney+)
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
I just base it off what the enemies are. Better way to explain it is she us just a mortal. Even Iron Man has is armor to protect him. They are fighting aliens/super powered beings and yet she can stand her own and not die right away. I mean fighting Thanos she should be dead in 1 sec.WyldeMan wrote:detective392 wrote:I'm sure they just don't care about the character. Black Widow is still the most useless Avenger but because the guys like her they keep giving her big parts. This is Marvel we are talking about.
Riiiiiiight, the only agent with clearance as high as Fury and she's the most useless Avenger? Except for Clint, she's the only one who uses her natural abilities. Thor is a demi-god, Banner is a side show, Captain was a science project and Stark was born a billionaire, the guy doesn't even have detective skills.....
Still not sure what your criteria of useless is, but I'd definitely put Natasha Romanov with all her natural talents and skills at the top of the list of Avengers.
But hey I'm a DC fan so I like women.
I know this is comic books so reality doesn't mean jack shit. I also feel the same way about the whole Batman/Superman thing. One punch from Superman and Batman should be out cold with broken bones. Not actually taking him on evenly.
detective392- Posts : 389
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 33
Location : Minnesota
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
lol! That's funny and true. I think they've already thought about this scenario for BvS and I don't want to hear stuff like "I pulled my punches" because it's just lame. Bats should come all equipped with armor like Tony is for the fight with Hulk. We're essentially talking about the same thing technically, I'd say Hulk and Superman have similar strengths.
To be fair though, Natasha hasn't gone head to head with any super powered being yet. She's only fought agents and aliens who don't have super powers. She got pushed by the Hulk once but he only shoved her and that paralized her for a moment. She's a good agent but she's not in the same league as the others, not even with Cap because he can hold his own with Thor or even Hulk temporarily.
To be fair though, Natasha hasn't gone head to head with any super powered being yet. She's only fought agents and aliens who don't have super powers. She got pushed by the Hulk once but he only shoved her and that paralized her for a moment. She's a good agent but she's not in the same league as the others, not even with Cap because he can hold his own with Thor or even Hulk temporarily.
UltimateMarvel- Posts : 10285
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : East Coast
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
I could see Widow being on AOS or something but not with the Avengers unless its little things like what Winter Solider started out as. Missions involving other mortals.UltimateMarvel wrote:lol! That's funny and true. I think they've already thought about this scenario for BvS and I don't want to hear stuff like "I pulled my punches" because it's just lame. Bats should come all equipped with armor like Tony is for the fight with Hulk. We're essentially talking about the same thing technically, I'd say Hulk and Superman have similar strengths.
To be fair though, Natasha hasn't gone head to head with any super powered being yet. She's only fought agents and aliens who don't have super powers. She got pushed by the Hulk once but he only shoved her and that paralized her for a moment. She's a good agent but she's not in the same league as the others, not even with Cap because he can hold his own with Thor or even Hulk temporarily.
I know Batman has armor in BvS I believe for his suit but unless its covered in Kryptinite which I believe Snyder said doesn't exist in his universe or he wasn't going to use it I still can't see Batman holding his own.
I know these are comic book movies so reality gets thrown right out the window.
detective392- Posts : 389
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 33
Location : Minnesota
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
Hulk please? Superman would make that neanderthal Sideshow act his bitch.
_________________
Wylde's Favorite Films of 2024:
Dune Part II
Wylde's Favorite Series of 2024:
Fallout (Prime), The Gentleman (Netflix), Shogun (Hulu/Disney+)
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
Potential MASSIVE Spoilers For Phase 3 Detailing Spidey's Arrival to the MCU.
- Spoiler:
Spoilers throughout.
Really.
Really, I’m going to just straight up spoil what I'm pretty sure happens at the end of two Phase 3 movies.
I’m not joking. If you’re going to get mad at me later, stop now, this column is on the internet, it’ll be accessible forever.
Avengers: Age of Ultron introduces a new group of Avengers lead by Captain America. Still think Hulk’s gonna be in space.
Captain America: Civil War exposes that Bucky killed Howard Stark, Iron Man and Captain America fight, Tony Stark is discouraged (I’m vague on how he ends up at the moment), Black Panther is introduced, Crossbones kills Steve Rogers at the end of the film, giving us a nice big cliffhanger from Marvel Studios’ two most profitable characters (Iron Man and Captain America). Since I’m so vague on what happens to Iron Man, but I’m pretty sure he can’t be flitting in and out of other Phase 3 movies without reducing the impact of his future return, let’s just say he’ll also be in space.
“In space” is going to be my character placeholder, as it’s obviously Marvel’s - OOOOOH! BURN!
Doctor Strange hits and I really think Marvel will avoid polluting this movie with too much crossover as they have to introduce the Astral Plane. But I do think Doctor Strange is on the short list for who will lead the New Avengers in Cap’s absence.
Thor: Ragnarok will kill a lot of Asgardians, resurrect some of them, and Thor will end up in some sort of prison (described to me as a “galactic prison,” but I don’t know if that means not in Asgard or what).
Cap’s dead, Thor’s gone, there are still Avengers, we take a break from the Earth’s problems for Guardians of the Galaxy 2, then return for Black Panther. It’s interesting that we’re going to need a new leader for The Avengers and the Black Panther is going to be introduced in a movie where The Winter Soldier’s dirty laundry will be aired. I’m not saying I know anything about this movie, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it includes more Avengers than the title suggests. They mystic nature of the Black Panther also allows Strange to pop up here if they want. But a New Avengers is being formed (not THE New Avengers from the comics, just SOME New Avengers).
Which brings us to May 4th, 2018 - Avengers: Infinity Wars Part 1. Here's what I understand: Steve Rogers is not in this movie. He is dead. Thor is not in this movie, he is imprisoned. Spider-Man IS in this movie, the Sony deal went through.
I don’t have the exact details nor a paper trail, but I’m told we’ll see an MCU Spider-Man in Infinity Wars Part 1, as that was the next logical place to insert him after they missed the window to logically include him in Civil War.
It’s sounding like Infinity War Part 1 will be the first true test of our New Avengers team (line-up still pending, but here are the potentials: Quicksilver, Scarlet Witch, Vision, Black Panther, Dr. Strange, Ant-Man, Wasp, Captain Marvel, Luke Cage, Daredevil, Iron Fist, Jewel/Power Woman, ANY of the New Inhumans, ANY of the classic Inhumans, ANY of the Guardians of the Galaxy and ANY Cosmic Marvel characters Guardians chooses to send to Earth...oh, and Spider-Man). However, Infinity Wars Part 1 won’t include any of our classic Phase 1 and 2 Avengers because…
...they’ll all return in Infinity Wars Part 2.
Yup, even freaking dead Steve Rogers it looks like.
This all seems like super-smart storytelling (letting characters go out on top, then bringing them back years later), and it’s made even more ingenious by the Spider-Man insurance policy. If people aren’t hooking into a Black Panther, Bucky Cap or Strange-lead team: HEY! Here’s history’s most profitable comic book character.
Now I’ve gotta spend my nights trying to figure out if Sony’s announced November 11th, 2016 Spider-Man movie is going to be a co-production or simply scrapped. Here’s hoping for co-production.POST CREDITS SCENE
_________________
Wylde's Favorite Films of 2024:
Dune Part II
Wylde's Favorite Series of 2024:
Fallout (Prime), The Gentleman (Netflix), Shogun (Hulu/Disney+)
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
That all sounds interesting but, says who? It doesn't sound like it's official and no source listed, might just be a rumor.
UltimateMarvel- Posts : 10285
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : East Coast
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
UltimateMarvel wrote:That all sounds interesting but, says who? It doesn't sound like it's official and no source listed, might just be a rumor.
I was having a hell of a time getting the rest of the article to copy so I posted what I could. Here's the full write-up.
A few of those details are from the comics one of them the biggest event something I've long been expecting since Winter Soldier was announced, though I now wonder just how much they intend to tie Agents of SHIELD and Avengers together if they are looking at bringing in secondary characters while connecting the movie verse to the tv world.
_________________
Wylde's Favorite Films of 2024:
Dune Part II
Wylde's Favorite Series of 2024:
Fallout (Prime), The Gentleman (Netflix), Shogun (Hulu/Disney+)
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
Cool! It looks like Sony is denying this so it's a false alarm I guess. Would love to see all of that on screen though.
By the way, the date is wrong in the title.
By the way, the date is wrong in the title.
UltimateMarvel- Posts : 10285
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : East Coast
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
UltimateMarvel wrote:Cool! It looks like Sony is denying this so it's a false alarm I guess.
Not likely, too much of that stuff was from source material and has been alluded to previously or hinted at in earlier films. I'd say more of that is probably right than wrong.
_________________
Wylde's Favorite Films of 2024:
Dune Part II
Wylde's Favorite Series of 2024:
Fallout (Prime), The Gentleman (Netflix), Shogun (Hulu/Disney+)
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
WyldeMan wrote:Not likely, too much of that stuff was from source material and has been alluded to previously or hinted at in earlier films. I'd say more of that is probably right than wrong.
I don't know man....
UPDATE: SuperHeroHype has reached out to a variety of sources, all of whom claim that the following is no more than a rumor. Although it would certainly be a fun team-up, don’t expect Spider-Man in the Marvel Cinematic Universe anytime soon. The original report reads as follows...
WARNING: Potential spoilers for Marvel Studios’ “Phase Three.”
The future of Spider-Man at Sony Pictures has been a big question mark ever since last year’s The Amazing Spider-Man 2 failed to meet studio expectations. Though spin-off films for the franchise are in development, with The Sinister Six even scheduled for release on November 11, 2016, there’s still been no official word on what will happen with the wall crawler.
Rumors and reports persisted last month in the wake of the Sony hack that discussions had taken place between Sony and Marvel Studios to “bring the character home,” though none of those details have been confirmed and vary wildly from place to place as to whether they fell through or would continue. Now, Latino-Review has quite the report on the webhead that, should it come to fruition, should delight many fans.
The outlet reports (following a number of potential spoilers for other Marvel films) that Marvel’s Avengers: Infinity War Part I will sideline a number of the heroes from Phase One (corroborating an earlier report that said the same) in favor of the new faces of Phase Three at the forefront. Among those faces, the site reports, will be none other than Spider-Man. Not only will an MCU version of the character reportedly appear in the film, but he will be played by a new actor.
It’s unclear what this means for the planned films at Sony or when, if true, an official announcement will come, but should our friendly neighborhood Spider-Man return to Marvel and meet his fellow Avengers, it will arguably be the biggest thing to happen in the history of superhero movies.
UltimateMarvel- Posts : 10285
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : East Coast
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
UltimateMarvel wrote:I don't know man....
Well if any of it was confirmed it would be obliterating Marvel's movie surprises for the next 4 straight years minimum.
_________________
Wylde's Favorite Films of 2024:
Dune Part II
Wylde's Favorite Series of 2024:
Fallout (Prime), The Gentleman (Netflix), Shogun (Hulu/Disney+)
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
Spider-Man will turn out to be Loki in disguise
Tyger- Posts : 3482
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Utah
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
The date is wrong in the title again.
UltimateMarvel- Posts : 10285
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : East Coast
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
It's the correct date. May 1st.UltimateMarvel wrote:The date is wrong in the title again.
detective392- Posts : 389
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 33
Location : Minnesota
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
detective392 wrote:It's the correct date. May 1st.UltimateMarvel wrote:The date is wrong in the title again.
Could have sworn it said 3/1 yesterday. Well, as long as it's fixed, it's all good.
UltimateMarvel- Posts : 10285
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : East Coast
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
It did say 3/1, swear all you want
Tyger- Posts : 3482
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Utah
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
Tyger wrote:It did say 3/1, swear all you want
Thats cause I got this fuckin kid Abe over here just keeps saying "the dates wrong" never bothering to give me the correct date just repeating! FUCKER!
_________________
Wylde's Favorite Films of 2024:
Dune Part II
Wylde's Favorite Series of 2024:
Fallout (Prime), The Gentleman (Netflix), Shogun (Hulu/Disney+)
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
WyldeMan wrote:Thats cause I got this fuckin kid Abe over here just keeps saying "the dates wrong" never bothering to give me the correct date just repeating! FUCKER!
Erm......you're welcome!
UltimateMarvel- Posts : 10285
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : East Coast
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
New trailer.
Rusty- Posts : 3902
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Australia
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
Love the slowmo group shot of them about to whupp ass.
Otherwise....
Not enough Hawkeye.
NO MAAM to Natasha and Blue Steel Banner hooking up.
The battle/destruction scenes look like lost footage from
the first movie.
Same shit, different villian.
Otherwise....
Not enough Hawkeye.
NO MAAM to Natasha and Blue Steel Banner hooking up.
The battle/destruction scenes look like lost footage from
the first movie.
Same shit, different villian.
ForeverBlu- Posts : 3834
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 60
Location : NYC
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
ForeverBlu wrote: The battle/destruction scenes look like lost footage from
the first movie.
Same shit, different villian.
Welcome to the world of Marvel, Loki is the perfect example of that. More of the same, just a different hat.
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
WyldeMan wrote:ForeverBlu wrote: The battle/destruction scenes look like lost footage from
the first movie.
Same shit, different villian.
Welcome to the world of Marvel, Loki is the perfect example of that. More of the same, just a different hat.
Spader sounds amazing, always loved his voice.
But this new one didn't get me pumped, like Winter Soldier did.
Is it too much to ask, for Clint/Hawkeye to actually speak in this trailer?
ForeverBlu- Posts : 3834
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 60
Location : NYC
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
ForeverBlu wrote:Spader sounds amazing, always loved his voice.
But this new one didn't get me pumped, like Winter Soldier did.
Is it too much to ask, for Clint/Hawkeye to actually speak in this trailer?
Spader's voice is half the reason Red Reddington works so perfectly. Spader is a brilliant character actor, but seems wasted as just a voice.
Did Hawkeye even speak more than twice in the first movie? I remember him saying and doing almost nothing as they kept him off screen for a long time.
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
WyldeMan wrote:Spader's voice is half the reason Red Reddington works so perfectly. Spader is a brilliant character actor, but seems wasted as just a voice.
Did Hawkeye even speak more than twice in the first movie? I remember him saying and doing almost nothing as they kept him off screen for a long time.
The most significant dialogue Clint had in the first one was with Fury in the opening.
Then with Natasha, after she beat his ass.
ForeverBlu- Posts : 3834
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 60
Location : NYC
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
This is the first trailer that's got me at all interested, but there are still red flags.
Tyger- Posts : 3482
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Utah
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
ForeverBlu wrote:WyldeMan wrote:Spader's voice is half the reason Red Reddington works so perfectly. Spader is a brilliant character actor, but seems wasted as just a voice.
Did Hawkeye even speak more than twice in the first movie? I remember him saying and doing almost nothing as they kept him off screen for a long time.
The most significant dialogue Clint had in the first one was with Fury in the opening.
Then with Natasha, after she beat his ass.
Ok I vaguely remember, I only saw it the one time.
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
I don't understand you guys, is the love for Hawkeye coming because of Renner or the character? Lets be honest, Hawkeye is not the coolest one of the bunch but you guys keep wanting to see more of him. I'm more excited to see Scarlet Witch or Quicksilver.
Awesome 3rd trailer by the way!
Awesome 3rd trailer by the way!
UltimateMarvel- Posts : 10285
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : East Coast
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
UltimateMarvel wrote:I don't understand you guys, is the love for Hawkeye coming because of Renner or the character? Lets be honest, Hawkeye is not the coolest one of the bunch but you guys keep wanting to see more of him. I'm more excited to see Scarlet Witch or Quicksilver.
Awesome 3rd trailer by the way!
Renner. But I still like Hawkeye way more than Iron Bitch and Ruffalupugus.
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
UltimateMarvel wrote:I don't understand you guys, is the love for Hawkeye coming because of Renner or the character? Lets be honest, Hawkeye is not the coolest one of the bunch but you guys keep wanting to see more of him. I'm more excited to see Scarlet Witch or Quicksilver.
Awesome 3rd trailer by the way!
I say both. I like Renner, and I like him as Hawkeye. However, Hawkeye's solo comic run by Matt Faction over the past couple of years has been fantastic. It really gave me a very interesting side of Hawkeye I'd never really considered, and illustrates how lacking his movie version is.
I realise Renner is a "movie" star ... but with Marvels universe stepping out into TV land with Agents of ..., Daredevil, Like Cage etc, I don't see how a Hawkeye series couldn't work. Even if it was only a one-off mini-series. Fill in the gaps, give us some origins and back-story. Flesh out his character a little more, and upgrade the Marvel movie world. He's a 3rd tier Avenger, yet still plays a role. He's never going to get the screen time in the movies, so TV can work.
Rusty- Posts : 3902
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Australia
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
I'm a long time Renner fan, ever since the film Dahmer.
But still somewhat familiar with Hawkeye's comic origins.
Why cast an actor with screen presence and talent in this role, then treat him like an afterthought?
But still somewhat familiar with Hawkeye's comic origins.
Why cast an actor with screen presence and talent in this role, then treat him like an afterthought?
ForeverBlu- Posts : 3834
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 60
Location : NYC
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
Rusty Cunt wrote:I realise Renner is a "movie" star ... but with Marvels universe stepping out into TV land with Agents of ..., Daredevil, Like Cage etc, I don't see how a Hawkeye series couldn't work. Even if it was only a one-off mini-series. Fill in the gaps, give us some origins and back-story. Flesh out his character a little more, and upgrade the Marvel movie world. He's a 3rd tier Avenger, yet still plays a role. He's never going to get the screen time in the movies, so TV can work.
Now that unlike all ABC's other mid-season shows actually would work. Sounds like it'd serve a purpose because really what was the point of showing peggy in the 40s again? Did it bring anything to the Marvel film universe or was it simply a filler show so that people wouldnt be as pissed this year when SHIELD went on hiatus. That was the entire reason she was given a show, as a gap filler and it showed by the quality level. Why not actually do something with purpose and develop the side characters? Bring him onto SHIELD, hook him up with Bobbi and then spin her off into her own West Coast Avengers series in which Renner can keep dropping by, then give him his own limited series.
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
Renner seems to be too busy for tv these days, that's why he turned down True Detective.
ForeverBlu- Posts : 3834
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 60
Location : NYC
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
ForeverBlu wrote:Renner seems to be too busy for tv these days, that's why he turned down True Detective.
He's doing 2-3 movies a year and considering how little he's used by the Avengers he probably has a bit of time still. Outside of Ultron, he's only got MI5 coming.
Re: Avengers: Age of Ultron ($1,142,508,000)
WyldeMan wrote:ForeverBlu wrote:Renner seems to be too busy for tv these days, that's why he turned down True Detective.
He's doing 2-3 movies a year and considering how little he's used by the Avengers he probably has a bit of time still. Outside of Ultron, he's only got MI5 coming.
Renner will start working on the next Aaron Cross/Bourne film soon.
Plus he has that Steve McQueen biopic and few other projects in development.
ForeverBlu- Posts : 3834
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 60
Location : NYC
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|