The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 24/11/15, 02:59 pm


Tom Cruise is in talks to star in Universal’s “The Mummy” reboot, helping to launch Universal’s new era of monster films, sources tell Variety.

The studio tapped Alex Kurtzman and Chris Morgan last summer to help develop a universe for Universal where its classic monster movie library is front and center. Kurtzman is also on board to direct and will produce alongside Morgan. Universal is not commenting on casting speculation regarding the project.

Jon Spaihts is penning the script. Plot details are vague other than it will be set in present day, unlike the previous three installments starring Brendan Fraser.

Cruise isn’t expected to produce, but he will play a major part in development. Characters from the monster universe films are expected to crop up in each other’s installments before culminating in an “Avengers”-style tie-in film.

Cruise is currently filming “Jack Reacher: Never Go Back.” Cruise was eyeing a reunion with Doug Liman on the space adventure “Luna Park,” but with Liman directing “Gambit” in the spring, Cruise’s schedule had an opening before he jumped into prep for “Mission: Impossible 6,” which shoots next August.


Last edited by WyldeMan on 11/06/17, 01:14 pm; edited 10 times in total
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 24/11/15, 03:01 pm

I still remember when Cruise nearly starred as Van Helsing before passing and Jackman took the role.
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by ForeverBlu on 24/11/15, 03:25 pm

Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, okay.
avatar
ForeverBlu

Posts : 3447
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 53
Location : NYC

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 24/11/15, 03:59 pm

Tom will defeat the Mummy and save the city by constantly running and climbing something very high.
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 08/12/15, 03:52 pm

Kingsman' Actress Sofia Boutella in Talks to Star as 'The Mummy'

Sofia Boutella, who had a breakout role in Kingsman: The Secret Service, is in talks to play the titular role in Universal's The Mummy, sources tell The Hollywood Reporter.

Yes, the monster in the new reboot will be female, as THR previously reported.

Tom Cruise is in negotiations to star in the modern-day set movie that Alex Kurtzman is helming and Universal will release March 24, 2017. Jon Spaihts wrote the script although plot details are being kept deep in the tomb. Kurtzman is producing with Chris Morgan and Sean Daniel.

Universal's The Mummy is planned as the first film in a series of interconnected monster films as Universal hopes to build a cinematic universe out of its vault of classic creature features. Other potential films revolve around the characters of Dracula, Frankenstein, the Invisible Man, the Bride of Frankenstein, and vampire hunter Van Helsing.

Boutella played the blade-legged assassin who serves as the henchman for Samuel L. Jackson's villain in Kingsman, Fox's breakout hit starring Colin Firth and Taron Egerton. She's a classically trained dancer who is known for hip hop and break-dancing, booking commercials for Nike and touring with Madonna.

Kingsman has catapulted her acting career, with her booking a role in Paramount’s Star Trek Beyond, directed by Justin Lin and most recently nabbing a part in The Coldest City, the spy thriller with Charlize Theron and James McAvoy that is in pre-production.

avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by ForeverBlu on 08/12/15, 05:03 pm

A female mummy, hmmmm.
avatar
ForeverBlu

Posts : 3447
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 53
Location : NYC

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 08/12/15, 05:35 pm

@ForeverBlu wrote:A female mummy, hmmmm.

I'm just surprised that an Egyptian won't be played by another white guy in mascara, this might confuse some folks. Razz
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 21/01/16, 01:24 pm

Universal Pushes ‘The Mummy’ To June 2017
With Tom Cruise officially signed on to The Mummy, Universal has pushed the release to June 9, 2017, from its initial March 24, 2017 date.

Cruise was said to be in talks for the role, and now that is confirmed. The film will face off against Lionsgate/Summit’s The Divergent Series: Ascendant and Paramount’s World War Z 2 on the June 9, 2017 date. Sofia Boutella (Kingsman: The Secret Service) co-stars. Alex Kurtzman directs and produces. Chris Morgan (Fast & Furious series, Wanted) and Sean Daniel (The Mummy trilogy, The Best Man series) also produce. Jon Spaihts (Prometheus) wrote the screenplay, and Bobby Cohen executive produces.

avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 21/01/16, 03:35 pm

When I first read about the delay I was like "Ah man that's so far away!" then I remembered it's 2016, lol.
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 07/03/16, 05:36 pm

‘Mummy’ Reboot Casts Annabelle Wallis

Annabelle Wallis is in talks for the female lead in Universal’s “The Mummy,” starring Tom Cruise, sources tell Variety.

Wallis will play an archaeologist in the film. Sofia Boutella, meanwhile, is on board to play the iconic monster.
The film is set to bow on June 9, 2017.

The studio tapped Alex Kurtzman and Chris Morgan last summer to help develop a monster universe for Universal with rebooted versions of classic monster movies. Kurtzman is also on board to direct, and will produce alongside Morgan and Sean Daniel.

Jon Spaihts is penning the script. Plot details are vague other than the fact that the pic will be set in the present day, unlike the previous three installments starring Brendan Fraser.

Universal’s executive VP of production, Jon Mone, and VP of development, Jay Polidoro, will oversee the project for the studio.

Wallis is best known for her work in Steven Knight’s “Peaky Blinders.” She also starred in the 2014 horror pic “Annabelle” and the comedy “Brothers Grimsby.” Wallis will play Maid Maggie in Guy Ritchie’s upcoming King Arthur movie — set for release in 2017. She also recently wrapped Zack Whedon’s thriller “Come and Find Me” opposite Aaron Paul.
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 07/03/16, 05:39 pm

Ohhhh Annabelle Wallis....love her on Peaky Blinders. She's been on Strike Back and The Tudors too.
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 08/03/16, 02:43 pm

THE MUMMY Adds NEW GIRL Star Jake Johnson
New Girl star Jake Johnson has joined The Mummy, the Universal Studios tentpole that is serving as the gateway into the studio’s cinematic monster universe.

The comedic actor, who was a scene-stealer in his first tentpole, Universal’s Jurassic World, is joining a roll call that includes Tom Cruise and Sofia Boutella, while Annabelle Wallis is in talks to also board the project.

The storyline is set in the modern day, with Cruise set to play a special forces soldier (or former soldier), sources tell The Hollywood Reporter. Wallis, one of the stars of British gangster show Peaky Blinders, is to be a scientist while Boutella, who had a breakout role in Kingsman: The Secret Service, is in talks to play the titular role.

In a role written specifically for him, Johnson will play a member of the military.
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 06/04/16, 12:24 pm

avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 04/05/16, 03:20 pm

Russell Crowe in Talks to Join Tom Cruise
Universal may have found the next A-lister to join its monster movie universe.

Russell Crowe is in early talks to play a Dr. Jekyll-type role, with the character first making an appearance in “The Mummy” starring Tom Cruise, sources tell Variety.

While other actors — like Johnny Depp in “The Invisible Man” — will first appear in standalone projects, insiders say some of the classic characters will make cameos in “The Mummy” as a means of launching spinoff franchises.

The studio tapped Alex Kurtzman and Chris Morgan last summer to help develop a monster universe for Universal with rebooted versions of the studio’s classic monster movies. Kurtzman is also on board to direct, and will produce alongside Morgan and Sean Daniel.

Universal’s hope is that Crowe’s small role in “The Mummy” would lead to a possible stand-alone pic for the character, giving Crowe and the studio a new franchise for its monster universe.
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 06/05/16, 08:53 am

Official ‘Mummy’ Synopsis Ushers in a New World of Gods and Monsters
Tom Cruise headlines a spectacular, all-new cinematic version of the legend that has fascinated cultures all over the world since the dawn of civilization: The Mummy.

Thought safely entombed in a crypt deep beneath the unforgiving desert, an ancient queen (Sofia Boutella) whose destiny was unjustly taken from her is awakened in our current day, bringing with her malevolence grown over millennia and terrors that defy human comprehension.

From the sweeping sands of the Middle East through hidden labyrinths under modern-day London, The Mummy brings a surprising intensity and balance of wonder and thrills in an imaginative new take that ushers in a new world of gods and monsters.”

Cruise is joined by a cast including Annabelle Wallis (AnnabellKing ArthurPeaky Blinders), Jake Johnson (Jurassic World) and Courtney B. Vance (TV’s American Crime Story: The People V. O.J. Simpson).

The creative team on this action-adventure event is led by director/producer Alex Kurtzman and producer Chris Morgan, who have been instrumental in growing some of the most successful franchises of the past several years—with Kurtzman writing or producing entries in the Transformers, Star Trek and Mission: Impossible series, and Morgan being the narrative engineer of the Fast & Furious saga as it has experienced explosive growth from its third chapter on.  Sean Daniel, who produced the most recent Mummy trilogy, produces alongside Kurtzman and Morgan.
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 07/05/16, 11:05 pm

‘The Mummy’ Is ‘Designed to Seriously Scare the Shit Out of You’
Unlike Brendan Fraser’s trilogy, Universal’s “The Mummy” reboot is better categorized as a horror pic than an action-adventure, according to Russell Crowe.

Crowe confirmed that he’s joined Tom Cruise in the upcoming remake.

“I’m gonna do it,” Crowe said about the film at a press junket at the Beverly Hilton promoting his action comedy “The Nice Guys,” according to Collider.

Crowe portrays Dr. Henry Jekyll, a Royal Society fellow, opposite Cruise, who plays a Navy Seal hunting terrorists. “New Girl” star Jake Johnson and “The People v. O.J. Simpson’s” Courtney B. Vance also recently boarded the movie.

When asked how the remake differs from Fraser’s films, Crowe said, “This one is kind of more designed to seriously scare the s— out of you.”

The Aussie actor added that he’s already been bouncing off ideas for the film with director Alex Kurtzman (“there were a few things I put up in the air and he picked up on them”).

“It’s very interesting, what they’re gonna do with that stuff. I’ve had a couple of chats about it with the director,” Crowe said before joking about his relationship with Cruise. “I’ve known Tom Cruise since 1992, or something like that. When he was married to an Australian, I was really good friends with him. But when he got divorced, I was part of the settlement package, and I went to Nicole [Kidman].”

The studio tapped Alex Kurtzman and Chris Morgan last summer to develop a monster universe with rebooted versions of its classic monster movies.

Universal hopes Crowe’s role in “The Mummy” will lead to a possible standalone film, potentially launching a new franchise.
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 30/07/16, 12:29 pm


Earlier this month, it was widely reported that, after an extensive four-month shoot, Universal Pictures' upcoming reboot of The Mummy had wrapped principal photography, but as it turns out, the team had only completed the London segment of their lengthy schedule.

After filming a number of high-intensity scenes with Tom Cruise earlier this week, the Mummy team has now shifted their base of operations to the African nation of Namibia where it will spend the final two weeks of production and presumably film the introduction of Sofia Boutella's titular villain and/or possibly the film's epic climax. Also, thanks to Cruise's co-star Annabelle Wallis, we have our first official behind-the-scenes photo of the cast on-set in Namibia, including our first real look at Jake Johnson & Courtney B. Vance's characters, who both seem to have a military background of some sort. We don't want to read too much into it, but it looks like there may have been some truth to that early rumor of the military accidentally awakening the classic monster villain.

avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by UltimateMarvel on 01/12/16, 12:47 pm

avatar
UltimateMarvel

Posts : 4839
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Marvel Universe

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by ForeverBlu on 01/12/16, 01:37 pm

So the full trailer drops on Sunday.
avatar
ForeverBlu

Posts : 3447
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 53
Location : NYC

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by UltimateMarvel on 01/12/16, 06:39 pm

Yep. I can't stand these kinds of trailers. Those eyes are creepy as shit though.
avatar
UltimateMarvel

Posts : 4839
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Marvel Universe

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by UltimateMarvel on 04/12/16, 11:22 pm

avatar
UltimateMarvel

Posts : 4839
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Marvel Universe

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 05/12/16, 12:18 pm

Lots of Annabelle. Cool
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by UltimateMarvel on 05/12/16, 06:10 pm

@WyldeMan wrote:Lots of Annabelle. Cool

Annabelle kicks ass, she's keeping up with Tom Cruise running. The action in this trailer looks awesome, didn't feel that scary to me though despite what it says in the article above.
avatar
UltimateMarvel

Posts : 4839
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Marvel Universe

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 05/12/16, 07:44 pm

@UltimateMarvel wrote:
@WyldeMan wrote:Lots of Annabelle. Cool

Annabelle kicks ass, she's keeping up with Tom Cruise running. The action in this trailer looks awesome, didn't feel that scary to me though despite what it says in the article above.

When Tom Cruise runs it's just called The Cruise Run but when two people do it, it's called Tom Cruising.

Cruise hasn't done anything dark since Interview with the Vampire over 20 years ago and even then, it was all gothic romantic vampires. He's never done horror and he never will. This is just another Mummy movie that looks like it's part of the last franchise.
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by Rusty Cunt on 05/12/16, 08:46 pm

CGI destruction of cities!

Pass.
avatar
Rusty Cunt

Posts : 1744
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Australia

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by UltimateMarvel on 05/12/16, 09:57 pm

Tom Cruise hasn't made a bad movie in a while so I think this one will be good too.
avatar
UltimateMarvel

Posts : 4839
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Marvel Universe

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by Rusty Cunt on 05/12/16, 11:07 pm

@UltimateMarvel wrote:Tom Cruise hasn't made a bad movie in a while so I think this one will be good too.

Nah it's just me. I'm done with blockbusters. I don't understand how this shit is even watchable for most folks anymore. How does computer graphics destroying computer graphics attract people in the slightest.

It's mind-numbingly disengaging.

I'm pretty sure it'll be proficient in it's execution and box office draw. Tom Cruise doesn't make bad movies, but he also doesn't make many exceptional movies - especially those that require a lot of special effects.

I'll take a Collateral, Lions for Lambs, or even another should-have-been-a-Netflix-series Jack Reacher any day over this shit.

His upcoming American Made sounds interesting. The Mummy does not.
avatar
Rusty Cunt

Posts : 1744
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Australia

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by ForeverBlu on 06/12/16, 11:33 am

Tom Cruise will be an stuntman in his next life.


Like the bts cast pic above, didb't know Courtney B. Vance was in this reboot.

Scientology issues aside, Tom seems like a nice guy to work with.

avatar
ForeverBlu

Posts : 3447
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 53
Location : NYC

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by UltimateMarvel on 06/12/16, 12:19 pm

@Rusty Cunt wrote:Nah it's just me. I'm done with blockbusters. I don't understand how this shit is even watchable for most folks anymore. How does computer graphics destroying computer graphics attract people in the slightest.

Sometimes you just want to watch movies like this to just enjoy it for what it is.

@Rusty Cunt wrote:I'll take a Collateral, Lions for Lambs, or even another should-have-been-a-Netflix-series Jack Reacher any day over this shit.

I'm with you on this.
avatar
UltimateMarvel

Posts : 4839
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Marvel Universe

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 06/12/16, 12:52 pm

@Rusty Cunt wrote:Nah it's just me. I'm done with blockbusters. I don't understand how this shit is even watchable for most folks anymore. How does computer graphics destroying computer graphics attract people in the slightest.

It's mind-numbingly disengaging.

I'm pretty sure it'll be proficient in it's execution and box office draw. Tom Cruise doesn't make bad movies, but he also doesn't make many exceptional movies - especially those that require a lot of special effects.

I'll take a Collateral, Lions for Lambs, or even another should-have-been-a-Netflix-series Jack Reacher any day over this shit.

His upcoming American Made sounds interesting. The Mummy does not.

It's not just you Rust, I tend to find the quieter moments in film to be the more engaging. I used to be into the blockbusters but on repeated viewings you tend to realize that once the initial wow wears off, there is usually no story. I just recently watched all four Bourne films, three for the first time in a decade and I found the last two of those two be like all the James Bond films, non-stop action and virtually no story or dialogue. Yet those are the films that make all the money and the world demands more. For some reason China which is the most dominant film market in the world now, devours the blockbusters and anything in 3D so they are the deciding factor in what gets made now.

Cruise usually ends up with co-stars vastly more talented with a more diverse body of work but Tom just Cruise Runs his way up and down walls while CGI buildings blow up behind him and he bounces off of objects and continues to run, everybody gets excited again they feed the box office and its rinse and repeat.

Rust, American Made is Doug Liman directed and written by a guy who's only other credit is a movie none of us have ever heard of called "Stash House" starring Dolph Lundgren, Sean Farris and Briana Evigan. So, what I'm saying is that you should probably temper expectations on that one too. Razz
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by ForeverBlu on 06/12/16, 01:19 pm

Collateral is Tom Cruise's best work to date.

JMO.

As for all the FRANTIC running, I keep telling you guys Tom is a frustrated Stuntman.


LOL!
avatar
ForeverBlu

Posts : 3447
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 53
Location : NYC

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 06/12/16, 01:25 pm

@ForeverBlu wrote:Collateral is Tom Cruise's best work to date.

JMO.

As for all the FRANTIC running, I keep telling you guys Tom is a frustrated Stuntman.

LOL!

He's just trying to run the Thetans....err demons out of his body.
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by ForeverBlu on 06/12/16, 02:32 pm

Maybe he's running from Xenu?
avatar
ForeverBlu

Posts : 3447
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 53
Location : NYC

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 06/12/16, 02:53 pm

@ForeverBlu wrote:Maybe  he's running from Xenu?

Don't you mean runs to Xenu? I imagine Tom on Oprah's couch every time he thinks about Xenu.
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by ForeverBlu on 06/12/16, 03:10 pm

@WyldeMan wrote:
@ForeverBlu wrote:Maybe  he's running from Xenu?

Don't you mean runs to Xenu? I imagine Tom on Oprah's couch every time he thinks about Xenu.





Laughing
avatar
ForeverBlu

Posts : 3447
Join date : 2014-12-10
Age : 53
Location : NYC

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 06/12/16, 03:56 pm

@ForeverBlu wrote:
@WyldeMan wrote:
@ForeverBlu wrote:Maybe  he's running from Xenu?

Don't you mean runs to Xenu? I imagine Tom on Oprah's couch every time he thinks about Xenu.

Laughing

He's just so damn deeeeeeeep into Sciencefictiontology that every single time the guy smiles I imagine he's conversing with Xenu in his head and thinking about soaring around the volcanoes together.
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 28/03/17, 10:25 pm

avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by UltimateMarvel on 02/04/17, 03:00 pm

avatar
UltimateMarvel

Posts : 4839
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Marvel Universe

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 18/05/17, 06:28 pm

avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 31/05/17, 09:49 am

Can Universal Create a Marvel-Like Universe With 'The Mummy' and Other Monster Flicks?
On May 22, Universal Pictures unveiled its "Dark Universe," an umbrella under which its monster movies will be released. At least five films are on the way, including The Invisible Man (with Johnny Depp), Dr. Jekyll (Russell Crowe), Frankenstein's Monster (Javier Bardem) and Bride of Frankenstein (not yet cast). But the future of the universe hinges on the performance of June 9's The Mummy, a Tom Cruise-led reboot of a trilogy of films started in 1999. Early tracking suggests the Alex Kurtzman-directed film may debut in the low $40 million range in North America — a modest opening salvo for what is hoped to be a series that could someday rival DC and Marvel.

Behind the scenes, Universal execs are said to be especially concerned about Mummy, even though insiders say a $40 million bow (plus a strong overseas haul) would be enough to move forward with the universe as planned. Comcast, Universal's parent company, is giving the film its so-called Symphony marketing push in the U.S. in which multiplatform divisions work together to promote a single project. And the film is expected to do the majority of its business abroad, where Cruise continues to be a major draw. The Mummy will open day-and-date in more than 60 markets, including China.

"Every new universe has to start somewhere," says box-office analyst Paul Dergarabedian. "If you look at [Universal's] Fate of the Furious, 80 percent of its box office came from international. Tom Cruise is an international superstar, and he remains so."

Still, the film represents a considerable gamble for Universal given that recent reboot attempts of aging intellectual property haven't fared well (see Alien: Covenant, Smurfs: The Lost Village and King Arthur: Legend of the Sword). In addition, Kurtzman, one of Hollywood's top writers, has only one feature credit as a director — the 2012 drama People Like Us, which earned just $12.4 million worldwide. But these days it's not unusual to enlist a director with no tentpole experience for a big-budget movie (think Jurassic World's Colin Trevorrow, Pirates 5's Joachim Ronning and Espen Sandberg, and Wonder Woman's Patty Jenkins).

Sources say The Mummy cost about $125 million after a considerable U.K. rebate, and Cruise is said to have earned $13 million upfront with sizable backend participation. Cruise's character will recur in the universe. The studio wants Angelina Jolie for its Bill Condon-helmed Bride of Frankenstein, the next film in the franchise, and she won't come cheap (for a similar effort, Disney's live-action Maleficent, the actress received $20 million plus profit participation). But negotiations with Jolie have yet to begin, even though Bride is the only Dark Universe follow-up that has been dated — for Feb. 14, 2019. There are rumors that Dwayne Johnson could resurface in the "monsterverse" for a Wolfman reboot (he starred in 2002's Mummy spinoff The Scorpion King).

What makes Dark Universe intriguing is that — unlike with DC and Marvel — the budgets of the films will range dramatically and could even include low-budget forays. For instance, sources say Universal-based microbudget horror producer Jason Blum has expressed interest in tackling a low-budget monsterverse outing. Also, insiders are quick to point out that Universal doesn't have to buy the IP (as Disney did with Marvel and Lucasfilm) because the studio has the titles in its library, dating to Carl Laemmle Jr.'s reign at Universal when he oversaw a 1931 Dracula and Frankenstein, a 1932 The Mummy, a 1933 The Invisible Man and a 1935 Bride of Frankenstein. Still, despite their long association with the studio, most of the monsters exist in the public domain, so there's little to stop other studios from pursuing films based on the characters.

Regardless of size, the films will offer a connecting thread, hatched by Kurtzman and Fast & Furious franchise writer Chris Morgan, via a mysterious multi-national organization known as Prodigium. Led by Jekyll, Prodigium's mission is "to track, study and — when necessary — destroy evil embodied in the form of monsters in our world."

But the name Dark Universe could prove problematic for Universal. Warner Bros. already has plans for the title with a supernatural-themed Justice League movie and a series of announced comic books branded under the Dark Universe banner. Warners is mulling legal action, according to a studio source.

Either way, Universal has upped the ante significantly from its most recent monsterverse outings, including the previous Mummy trilogy starring Brendan Fraser and Scorpion King (those four films earned $1.415 billion worldwide). A 2004 Van Helsing toplined by Hugh Jackman took in $300 million globally. But 2010's The Wolfman with Benicio Del Toro and the 2014 Dracula Untold starring Luke Evans seemed to dampen hopes for a revival when their total hauls were just $140 million and $217 million, respectively.

This time around, the awareness is greater, though rival studios question why Universal opted for a Mummy poster without Cruise. Still, the film's first trailer has been viewed more than 179 million times, beginning with its broadcast debut in December on NBC Sunday Night Football; a second trailer had more than 134 million views.

"The first great movie character universe was a vision of Carl Laemmle Jr.'s," says Sean Daniel, who produced this Mummy and the last three. "So creating this Dark Universe brand and bringing back these characters makes sense. Done right, people will always love monster movies."
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 31/05/17, 09:50 am

Uhhhhhhhh say what now? Buried in that article, I highlighted one crazy rumor in red which has The Rock up for the Wolfman now?!?!?!?!?
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by UltimateMarvel on 31/05/17, 06:27 pm

LOL! Rock is in everything these days. Only a rumor though so could be false.
avatar
UltimateMarvel

Posts : 4839
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Marvel Universe

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 31/05/17, 10:25 pm

@UltimateMarvel wrote:LOL! Rock is in everything these days. Only a rumor though so could be false.

President Wolfman Rock
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by WyldeMan on 08/06/17, 07:58 am

The critics are slaughtering this mess, it's currently sitting at a 24% on RT and while Mummy may do well overseas it's domestic opening is only looking at about $35 million compared to Wonder Woman's $60 million second weekend. The cornerstone to their next huge franchise is already a failure in the states and the only hope is that the foreign markets will save this $200 million disaster.
avatar
WyldeMan
Admin

Posts : 14008
Join date : 2014-12-09
Age : 31
Location : West Coast

http://bdtv.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by UltimateMarvel on 08/06/17, 11:31 am

Damn! A bad Tom Cruise movie? It's unheard of. What's going to happen to the Dark Universe they have planned out if this one bombs?
avatar
UltimateMarvel

Posts : 4839
Join date : 2014-12-09
Location : Marvel Universe

Back to top Go down

Re: The Mummy ($174,046,120)

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum